Progressive left and postliberal right intellectuals converge in teaching scorn for Americas founding principles. Attacking ...

Which is where I find “unalienable” interesting, and a source of our understanding of civil rights which comes to fuller flower in the Bill of Rights, some 15 years later.

Image: AP America’s Founders defined unalienable rights as including “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” They designed the Constitution to protect individual dignity and freedom.

“Unalienable rights” are ours to keep, by virtue of our Creator, so said Thomas Jefferson through the Declaration of Independence and by our Founders as they signed this incredible document.

Because unalienable rights are universal and rooted in human nature, the report calls them "pre-political in the sense that they are not created by persons or society." ...

Unalienable Rights, Reconstruction, and Constitutional Continuity COMMENTARY By Peter Berkowitz - RCP Contributor October 19, 2019 ...

To secure freedom at home and abroad, Americans must rightly understand the nation’s founding principles. That’s why, last year, I convened the State Department’s Commission on Unalienable ...

Unalienable rights are endowed by our Creator upon every human by virtue of being human, and privileges are given by our American government to a specific group of people — Americans.

It is when we limit knowledge, erase history and mute voices that we constrain freedom and embark on the path to totalitarianism.

Unalienable rights are universal and nontransferable. They are pre-political in the sense that they are not created by persons or society but rather set standards for politics. … ...

In light of the protests and mass gatherings (and tweets from the president) demanding the instant reopening of the economy, I guess we will have to rewrite the Declaration of Independence to ...

It should surprise no one that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s Commission on Unalienable Rights is ahistoric nonsense. That women’s rights have always been human rights might be inconvenient ...