该研究的重要意义在于，为抽签式气候大会的理论和实践发展提供了新的方向。它打破了以往仅从理论层面探讨的局限，基于实际案例和民众经验，提出了公正抽签（Just sortition）和社群协商（Communitarian deliberation）的理念，有助于提升气候大会在应对气候变化方面的有效性，推动全球气候行动朝着 ...

Sortition can potentially obviate the risk of politicians manipulating election rules to their advantage, mitigate public health risks, and mitigate the dangers of widespread political ignorance.

Why Sortition is Unlikely to Sort Out the Shortcomings of Democracy. Unfortunately, sortition is not nearly as good a solution to the problem of political ignorance as it might initially seem.

My thoughts on recent proposals to overcome political ignorance by using jury-like institutions to make political decisions. Third in a series of posts based on the new edition of my book ...

Sortition can be used in different contexts, as was shown in the aforementioned examples. Neglecting it at the expense of other institutions is a mistake, as it is a mistake to restrict direct ...

Sortition is a fascinating idea and might make an interesting small-scale experiment. But as a form of national government, it doesn’t seem all that much better than what we have now—just bad ...

The sortition-selected MPs should have the same entitlements and salary as for an elected MP. If they already hold a job in government, they have would leave the job for one term of office, and revert ...

How voter turnout would determine the number of legislators selected via sortition would depend on the electoral system. In 2024, if voter apathy counted as a candidate, it would have won 611 out ...

Sortition shifts the focus from retrospective punishment through the ballot box – ‘punishment’ when the damage of poor decisions made for the benefit of vested interests is long since ...

Random chance is impartial. Under sortition, there would be no need for political parties, as there is no “party” to speak of. No PACs would sponsor parties or candidates.