Arch argued that the interrelated wrongful acts definition should be read expansively to require only a common fact, circumstance, etc. between the two acts. Arch argued that, under an expansive ...

The policies defined “Interrelated Wrongful Acts” as “all Wrongful Acts that have as a common nexus any fact, circumstance, situation, event, transaction, cause or series of related facts ...

A key component to any claims-made policy is the existence of an “interrelated wrongful acts” provision. Claims-made policies typically provide coverage only for claims first made during the ...

The court also pointed out that the policy defined “interrelated wrongful acts” to include a common nexus of any —rather than all —facts, circumstances, situations, events, or transactions.