An intellectual war of words has broken out between two of the world's leading evolutionists. Oxford University's Richard Dawkins and Harvard's Edward Wilson have gone head to head over the ...

Evolutionists Versus Creationists The science community has long ago relegated creationism to that of a religious proposition because it had far too little scientific basis to be called a ...

Commentary Published: December 2007 Protein engineers turned evolutionists Sergio G Peisajovich & Dan S Tawfik Nature Methods 4, 991–994 (2007) Cite this article ...

Altman then says the debate between evolutionists and creationists “is not so much about the merits of beliefs, or about that slippery notion, truth. It is about access to ideas.” ...

News Published: 22 November 2006 Anti-evolutionists raise their profile in Europe Nature 444, 406–407 (2006) Cite this article ...

Olson believes the evolutionists are right, but he also thinks they're overbearing and inept at public relations. Darwin's current defenders, he argues, lack the wit and skill of the late ...

To the editor:According to evolutionists, an explosion occurred and over time man, animals and plants emerged. Every explosion I have seen destroys. If we emerged from an explosion, that which ...

Evolutionists play poker, and there's a lesson on the unintelligent design of rabbits, that have to eat their own poop to get nutrients from their food.

Evolutionists appear able to construe virtually any fact into a scenario that supports their faith-based ideology, but the disconcerting thing is that they get away with labeling it science.

Sometimes evolutionists do, too. I often hear what was stated in a recent "My View" column: The theory of evolution is a tested and established explanation accounting for known facts.

Reviews the book 'The Evolutionists: The Struggle for Darwin's Soul,' by Richard Morris. By PT Staff, published November 1, 2001 - last reviewed on June 9, 2016 ...