The consequentialist case for liberty isn't perfect. But perfection isn't on the table. So we should go for the least imperfect moral theory—and that's consequentialism. Reply: Kuznicki to Freiman ...

Dr. Mark R. Fondacaro J.D.Ph.D., Ms. Megan J. O'Toole, American Punitiveness and Mass Incarceration: Psychological Perspectives on Retributive and Consequentialist Responses to Crime, New Criminal Law ...

The University of Chicago Press publishes more than 90 scholarly journals that cover a wide range of disciplines, from the humanities and the social sciences to the life and physical sciences. In ...

Pojman defines the consequentialist principle as holding that: “the rightness or wrongness of an act is determined by the goodness or badness of the results that flow from it” A more complete ...

Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.

His behavior was as far from consequentialist as you can get. That’s because Jesus is without sin and he never tried to do evil that good could come from it. We do that, not him. He is all light.

And I am inclined to agree that the consequentialist case for gay marriage – that it will change gay culture for the better, that it will strengthen marriage as an institution, etc. – is ...