In fact, I recommended that readers avoid use of SQLXML 3.0 DiffGrams because of poor performance. I should have mentioned authentication and authorization issues as additional drawbacks.

In fact, I recommended that readers avoid use of SQLXML 3.0 DiffGrams because of poor performance. I should have mentioned authentication and authorization issues as additional drawbacks. I also agree ...

In fact, I recommended that readers avoid use of SQLXML 3.0 DiffGrams because of poor performance. I should have mentioned authentication and authorization issues as additional drawbacks. I also agree ...

The SQLXML vulnerability enables the transfer of XML data to and from SQL Server 2000. Database queries can be returned in the form of XML documents which can then be stored or transferred easily.

Pros and Cons of SQLXML Roger Jennings answers a reader who asserts that using the SQLXML interface to provide HTTP access to SQL Server is not appropriate for high-performance, enterprise solutions.

In fact, I recommended that readers avoid use of SQLXML 3.0 DiffGrams because of poor performance. I should have mentioned authentication and authorization issues as additional drawbacks. I also agree ...

Pros and Cons of SQLXML Roger Jennings and a reader acknowledge that using the SQLXML interface to provide HTTP access to SQL Server is not appropriate for high-performance enterprise solutions. By ...